### The sillyness of RELATIVITY

The only way we at current can say a thing is something is to say it is not something else. We measure things in relation to things, hot is temper related to cold, the temperature of a thing depends on the temperature of another thing, the location of a thing depends on the location of another thing.

Outside of relation, is infinite regression and it seems that humanity is afraid of math like that. Even though they have infinite regression embedded into every concept substance which exists they choose rather to ignore the foot and seek some sort of "simpler" route to eventually extend themselves into infinite space/time one hand hold at a time.

All potentialities are so simply possible once infinite regression is embraced.

The alphabet gives us the substantial diagrams to deal with, the method is vector based though, we mathematically vector a relativity in order to be of relativity. We delimit in order to delimit and without infinite zoom we cannot zoom infinitely.

to-of|fo-ot

base|b-as-e

being|be-in-g

if one divides one, one splits into two, PLUS one divider (3)

if one multiplies one, one is joined by a second one and thus two PLUS one multiplyer (3)

if one subtracts one, one (doing) subtracting still exists as one

if one adds one, yes, there is two. unless we don't include the adder.

In math there is truly only X as a universal actor.

Things multiply BY dividing

Things get smaller by dividing

Things get larger by multiplying

Things divide by multiplying

X represents all four equate types.

An interesting thing to note here is that subtraction has less traction to stand on than the rest as subtraction means relocation. Nothing is made to cease to exist in subtraction, it is merely relocated out of the field of view.

Addition is also akin to subtraction as nothing is truly added, it is merely translated from another position into view.

Multiplication and division are one and the same in that in order to STRETCH we FLEX.

Outside of relation, is infinite regression and it seems that humanity is afraid of math like that. Even though they have infinite regression embedded into every concept substance which exists they choose rather to ignore the foot and seek some sort of "simpler" route to eventually extend themselves into infinite space/time one hand hold at a time.

All potentialities are so simply possible once infinite regression is embraced.

The alphabet gives us the substantial diagrams to deal with, the method is vector based though, we mathematically vector a relativity in order to be of relativity. We delimit in order to delimit and without infinite zoom we cannot zoom infinitely.

to-of|fo-ot

base|b-as-e

being|be-in-g

if one divides one, one splits into two, PLUS one divider (3)

if one multiplies one, one is joined by a second one and thus two PLUS one multiplyer (3)

if one subtracts one, one (doing) subtracting still exists as one

if one adds one, yes, there is two. unless we don't include the adder.

In math there is truly only X as a universal actor.

Things multiply BY dividing

Things get smaller by dividing

Things get larger by multiplying

Things divide by multiplying

X represents all four equate types.

An interesting thing to note here is that subtraction has less traction to stand on than the rest as subtraction means relocation. Nothing is made to cease to exist in subtraction, it is merely relocated out of the field of view.

Addition is also akin to subtraction as nothing is truly added, it is merely translated from another position into view.

Multiplication and division are one and the same in that in order to STRETCH we FLEX.